Somewhat quoting Frederick Burnham, “Foremost, she holds a complacent belief in the unending plenty of our natural wealth.”
By this I mean she holds a smug belief that the limits of Man, as self/creator/thinker, are nonexistent and good and positively bountiful (‘positively’ loosely defined by her as ‘positive,’ which is vague and leaves it up to her to define the terms however she wishes, which she does). And that Man has all right to do whatever they wish and can, a limitless perspective, in/with/and to the world. A world which is strictly limited (limitless is impossible).
She smugly thinks the world’s resources are limitless and to thus be used by those who are limitless; this is a false belief stacked on top of another false belief. Picture a being who believes the building/ business they create is so grand and positive to the overall picture that deforestation, genocide, pollution, &c. are all just and necessary and in a sense reversible.
That’s why a lot of people liken her to a sociopath. That’s why she’s wrong.